Monday, 30 April 2007

Iran

Should we invade Iran ? ( and probaly make a balls up of it like we did Iraq ) or what ?

The situation currently stands that Iran is developing nuclear material (which they say is to generate power ) however could be used for nuclear explosive devices.

Now I believe we should most and foremost protect the people of this nation, however to go to war there must be significant evidence and proof. Remember Iraq, they siad there were weapons of mass distruction which could reach the UK, however have any ever been found ?

So Iraq there was no evidence and over 140 of our troops have now been killed in Iraq ( not to mention the large number of americans ) We have destroyed the country and ruined the infrastructure and Iran couled be a repeat.

We ahve spent billions in going to war, not only in money but in lives.

Personally - we shouldn't go to Iran ( not to say the soilders and armed forces are great becuase they are ) but is there is a serious threat ? is there evidence ? are we going to mes it up like Iraq ? and how many inncoent lives will be killed and lost in the proces both british and Iranian ?

1 comment:

Simon said...

My view with Iran is simple.

NO LAND INVASION. NO REPEAT OF IRAN.

If there's proof of nuclear wepon activty [b] that threatens England [/b] send in the SAS.